COOK v. KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
JEFF COOK |
KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA and KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC. |
1:2021cv02541 |
September 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James R Sweeney |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC.. (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC.. (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda L. Shelby on behalf of Defendant KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC.. (Shelby, Amanda) |
Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KEIHIN AIRCON NORTH AMERICA, INC. (DJH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward M. Smid on behalf of Plaintiff JEFF COOK. (Smid, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6767934) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Smid, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.