LOVING v. INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff: BERNARD E LOVING
Defendant: INMAR, INC. and INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv02563
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/4/2022 10:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 11/9/2021.(SWM)
November 2, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Carr, David)
November 2, 2021 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Carr, David)
November 2, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kayla Ernst on behalf of Defendant INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Ernst, Kayla)
November 2, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Carr on behalf of Defendant INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Carr, David)
October 27, 2021 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Inmar Supply Chain Solutions, LLC, filed by BERNARD E LOVING.(Logan, Paul)
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by BERNARD E LOVING. INMAR, INC. served on 10/12/2021. (Haskin, John)
October 5, 2021 Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (MAC)
October 4, 2021 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK)
October 4, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INMAR, INC.. (LMK)
October 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Anthony Logan on behalf of Plaintiff BERNARD E LOVING. (Logan, Paul)
October 1, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Haskin on behalf of Plaintiff BERNARD E LOVING. (Haskin, John)
October 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INMAR, INC., filed by BERNARD E LOVING. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6773841) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Haskin, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOVING v. INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BERNARD E LOVING
Represented By: Paul Anthony Logan
Represented By: John H. Haskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INMAR, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INMAR SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC
Represented By: David J. Carr
Represented By: Kayla Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?