HARRIS v. INDYGO, LLC
NICOLE HARRIS |
INDY GO LLC and INDYGO, LLC |
1:2021cv02585 |
October 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
James R Sweeney |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Larimer withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 11/18/2021. (CBU) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance of Sarah Larimer, filed by Plaintiff NICOLE HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Boyd, Amber) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Plaintiff NICOLE HARRIS. (Boyd, Amber) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to INDYGO, LLC. (JDC) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to INDYGO, LLC. (Larimer, Sarah) |
Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to INDYGO, LLC. (LMK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Larimer on behalf of Plaintiff NICOLE HARRIS. (Larimer, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INDY GO LLC, filed by NICOLE HARRIS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6779971) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Larimer, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.