KYLES v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR. |
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FREDERICK A. MEDLEY and JAMES W. SHAFFER |
1:2021cv02614 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 5 ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is GRANTED. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/9/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMK) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/13/2021) (LMK). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, filed by DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMK) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/13/2021) (LMK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.