QUINN v. STATE OF INDIANA
| JEREMY QUINN |
| STATE OF INDIANA |
| 1:2021cv02732 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters final judgment. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/29/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION - Jeremy Quinn is in custody pursuant to Indiana convictions for dealing in marijuana and methamphetamine. Dkt. #2 at 1. He has filed a "motion for modification of sentence to an alternative placement," seeking transfer to an alternative placement program. Id. at 12. This motion is made pursuant to Indiana Code 35-38-1-17. This is a federal court. This Court has no jurisdiction over a motion based on state law from a prisoner in state custody seeking to modify his state conviction. Mr. Quinn's relief lies, if anywhere, in state court. This action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for evaluation, dkt. #4 , is DENIED for the same reason. Final judgment shall now enter. The Court notes that Mr. Quinn was convicted in Posey County, Indiana. The address for the Posey County Circuit Court is 300 Main Street, Mt. Vernon, IN 47620. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/29/2021. (AKH)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Order for Evaluation, filed by Plaintiff JEREMY QUINN. (LMK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance Pro Se by Plaintiff JEREMY QUINN. (LMK) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JEREMY QUINN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order to Transport)(LMK) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JEREMY QUINN located at WESTVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JEREMY QUINN to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: QUINN v. STATE OF INDIANA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JEREMY QUINN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
