ELLIS v. JUAEZ et al
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS |
JUAEZ, GARY, SHERI WILSON, BAILEY and COMMANDER |
1:2021cv02745 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
|
|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Judge Sarah Evans Barker is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:21-cv-2745-JMS-DML, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BAILEY, COMMANDER, GARY, JUAEZ, SHERI WILSON, filed by DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.