WILDER v. BOLINGER
| GREGORY WILDER |
| GEORGIANNA BOLINGER |
| 1:2021cv02853 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 58 - Having this day directed the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/13/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - On November 18, 2021, the Court entered an order directing Mr. Wilder show cause why his claims should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 3. The Court also directed Mr. Wilder to either pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 4. The Court gave Mr. Wilder until December 17, 2021 to complete both actions. Id.; dkt. 3. That deadline has passed, and Mr. Wilder has not paid the fee or responded to the show cause order. Therefore, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Final Judgment shall issue by separate entry. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/13/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Plaintiff Gregory Wilder has filed his complaint without paying the $402.00 filing fee or demonstrating that he lacks the financial ability to do so. Mr. Wilder SHALL either pay the $402 filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis by December 17, 2021. The Clerk shall include a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with Mr. Wilder's copy of this order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/29/2021. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 form motion to proceed in forma pauperis)(DWH)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Mr. Wilder shall have through December 17, 2021 to file an amended complaint or otherwise show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/17/2021. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGIANNA BOLINGER, filed by GREGORY WILDER. (No fee paid with this filing) (LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WILDER v. BOLINGER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GREGORY WILDER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GEORGIANNA BOLINGER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
