GONZALEZ-TORRES v. KNIGHT
| ANGEL GONZALEZ-TORRES |
| WENDY KNIGHT |
| 1:2021cv02935 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Amended Certificate of Service for Notice of 42-Day Ext by Respondent, filed by Respondent WENDY KNIGHT. (Barrow, Frances) Modified on 1/13/2022 - edited title (AKH).
|
|
Filing 6
Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by WENDY KNIGHT. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 2/22/2022. (Barrow, Frances)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Frances Hale Barrow on behalf of Respondent WENDY KNIGHT. (Barrow, Frances)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ANGEL GONZALEZ-TORRES. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Indiana Department of Correction inmate Angel Gonzalez-Torres petitions for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his disciplinary conviction in a prison disciplinary case on June 18, 2021. Dkt. #1 . The petitioner shall have through December 29, 2021 in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The petitioner's custodian is directed to answer the allegations of the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted insofar as the petitioner challenges the deprivation of a recognized liberty interest affecting the fact or the duration of his confinement. This shall be done within forty-two (42) days of the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. Although additional motions for time are not anticipated, all subsequent motions for time must include the petitioner's anticipated release date if the relief sought by the petitioner is granted. Show Cause Response due by 1/11/2022. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/30/2021.(AKH)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ANGEL GONZALEZ-TORRES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Statement of Carlos Slater)(DJH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GONZALEZ-TORRES v. KNIGHT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANGEL GONZALEZ-TORRES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT | |
| Represented By: | Frances Hale Barrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
