DE LOS MONTEROS v. INNOVATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
| IGNACIO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS |
| INNOVATION ASSOCIATES, INC. doing business as IA |
| 1:2021cv02936 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER - Acknowledges NOTICE OF DISMISSAL; Dismissal with prejudice acknowledged #6 . JMS, DJ 1/11/22. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/10/2022. (marginal notation) Distribution via U.S. Mail to Plaintiff (CKM)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff IGNACIO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS (AKH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to Innovation Associates, Inc. d/b/a IA. (MAC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Espinosa de los Monteros's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 , is GRANTED. Mr. Espinosa de los Monteros's discrimination claim under Title VII and his discrimination and retaliation claims under the ADEA are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c) (3) requires the Court to order service for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is DESIGNATED pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendant Innovation Associates, Inc. in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint, [Filing No. #1 ], applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. If Mr. Espinosa de los Monteros believes that additional claims were alleged in the Complaint, but not identified by the Court in this Entry, he shall have until January 7, 2022 to identify those claims. (See Order). Copies sent via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/7/2021. (MAC)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, IGNACIO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INNOVATION ASSOCIATES, INC., filed by IGNACIO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Dismissal and Notice of Righs)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DE LOS MONTEROS v. INNOVATION ASSOCIATES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: IGNACIO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: INNOVATION ASSOCIATES, INC. doing business as IA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
