SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
| SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY |
| 1:2021cv02971 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| James R Sweeney |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' #5 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal. The Clerk is directed to PERMANENTLY SEAL Docket No. 4. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/10/2022. (SWM)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Jennell C Bilek for SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/14/2021. (SWM)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Jennell C. Bilek to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-6883792), filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bilek, Jennell) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A-'334 Patent). (MAC) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE - This matter is before the Court upon Jennell C. Bilek's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cause only. [Dkt. 11.] The motion was electronically filed by Samuel Lockner but electronically signed by Jennell Bilek. As such, the filing violates the Court's Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures Manual, which provides in relevant part as follows (see Order). the motion [Dkt. 490 ] is hereby STRICKEN as improperly filed. Ms. Bilek must first comply with Local Rule 83-6(b), and then she may refile the motion using the ECF log in provided to her by the Court. Copy to Jennell C. Bile via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/10/2021. (SWM)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Samuel T. Lockner for SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/10/2021. (SWM) Modified on 12/13/2021 (SWM).
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Judge James Patrick Hanlon is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:21-cv-2971-JMS-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/8/2021. (PKP)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge James R. Sweeney II is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:21-cv-2971-JPH-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/7/2021. (BRR)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Jennell C. Bilek to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-6872900), filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lockner, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Samuel T. Lockner to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-6872795), filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lockner, Samuel) |
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to ELI LILLY AND COMPANY. (DJH) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Riley H. Floyd on behalf of Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Floyd, Riley) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal #4 SEALED Document (Case Participants - doc) , filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Limrick, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal #4 SEALED Document (Case Participants - doc) , filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MAINTAIN DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL)(Limrick, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SEALED Complaint, filed by Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--'334 Patent)(Limrick, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Limrick, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Limrick on behalf of Plaintiffs SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Limrick, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-6871701) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--'334 Patent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Limrick, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
