BROOKS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
| MATTHEW S. BROOKS |
| WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JONES, WILLIAMS, GEO GROUP, INC., KEITH BUTTS, DAVID DENNY, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, SCHILLING, ALUMNI STAFFING, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT CARTER, JR., TODD ROKITA and THOMAS JOSEPH FLYNN |
| 1:2021cv03109 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RECEIPT #IP077907 for partial filing fee in the amount of $13.82, paid by MATTHEW BROOKS. (DJH) |
| Filing 9 Submission of Previously Filed Motion to Correct Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff MATTHEW S. BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Trust Account Statement, #2 Notice of Deficiency, #3 Envelope)(LBT) |
| Filing 8 Submission of previously filed Motion to Correct Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff MATTHEW S. BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Deficiency, #2 Inmate Trust Account Statement, #3 Envelope)(LBT) |
Filing 7
ORDER on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirteen Dollars and Eighty-Two Cents ($13.82). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through February 28, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. His motion to correct deficiency in which he provided a copy of the transaction history associated with his inmate trust account, dkt. #6 , is granted consistent with this ruling. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/31/2022. Copy Mailed/cc:Fin (CKM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Correct Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff MATTHEW S. BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Deficiency, #2 Inmate Trust Account, #3 Envelope)(TPS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 3, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, MATTHEW S. BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALUMNI STAFFING, LLC, KEITH BUTTS, ROBERT CARTER, JR, DAVID DENNY, THOMAS JOSEPH FLYNN, GEO GROUP, INC., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JONES, TODD ROKITA, SCHILLING, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WILLIAMS, and HANNAH WINNINGHAM, filed by MATTHEW S. BROOKS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Tort, #2 Exhibit B letter RE Notice of Tort Claim, #3 Exhibit C receipts, #4 Exhibit D letter RE Claim No. 20-06694, #5 Exhibit E Letter to ACLU and USM-285 to Todd Rokita, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
