ADAMS v. LYLES-ROBERTSON
| NATHAN L. ADAMS |
| WHITNEY L. LYLES-ROBERTSON |
| 1:2021cv03130 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER - Plaintiff Nathan L. Adams's motion for time, dkt [ #7 ], is granted. Mr. Adams shall have through March 23, 2022, in which to pay the Four Hundred and Two-Dollar Filing Fee in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 2/24/2022. (SWM)
|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT by NATHAN L. ADAMS. (JRB) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against WHITNEY L. LYLES-ROBERTSON, filed by NATHAN L. ADAMS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(JRB) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff NATHAN L. ADAMS. (JRB) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 18, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Attachments: #1 Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (JRT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT For Compliance With Screening Of Offender Litigation by NATHAN L. ADAMS. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against WHITNEY L. LYLES-ROBERTSON, filed by NATHAN L. ADAMS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by NATHAN L. ADAMS located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by NATHAN L. ADAMS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ADAMS v. LYLES-ROBERTSON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATHAN L. ADAMS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WHITNEY L. LYLES-ROBERTSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
