JOHNSON v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC
| RANDAL D JOHNSON |
| CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC |
| 1:2022cv00057 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MARGINAL ENTRY re Plaintiff's #9 Motion for Clerk to Issue Summons. Granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b), the Clerk is direct ed to sign and seal the Summons. Copies to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/3/2022. (SWM) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Summons in a Civil Action, filed by Plaintiff RANDAL D JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons for Convergent Outsourcing Inc.)(AKH) |
| Filing 8 RECEIPT #IP077996 for filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by RANDAL JOHNSON. (DJH) |
| Filing 7 MARGINAL ENTRY - regarding #6 Motion. ACKNOWLEDGED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/25/2022. (AKH) |
| Filing 6 MOTION, filed by Plaintiff RANDAL D JOHNSON. (AKH) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by RANDAL D JOHNSON. (AKH) |
Filing 4
ENTRY DENYING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - On January 10, 2022, Plaintiff Randal D. Johnson filed a Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Filing No. #2 ). The Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. #2 , is DENIED because he has sufficient income and/or resources to prepay the entire filing fee of $402.00. His Motion notes that he is employed and unmarried and has no dependents. He receives monthly wages in the amount of $2,476.78, which exceed his monthly expenses of $2,086.99, and he also has cash or checking or savings accounts with $1,246.08. He also notes having more than $17,000.00 in other types of accounts. The Plaintiff shall have through February 28, 2022, in which to pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/18/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RANDAL D JOHNSON. (LMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC, filed by RANDAL D JOHNSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RANDAL D JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
