DUKE v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
| CASEY DUKE |
| TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION |
| 1:2022cv00101 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2022 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Section III(A) through (E) of the proposed CMP shall include the following deadlines (see Order for established deadlines and additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/31/2022.(SWM) Modified on 3/1/2022 (GD).
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, Corporate Parent TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Corporate Parent TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION.. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John E. Joseph on behalf of Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Plaintiff CASEY DUKE. (Smith, Larry) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Marco on behalf of Plaintiff CASEY DUKE. (Marco, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, filed by CASEY DUKE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-6927575) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DUKE v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CASEY DUKE | |
| Represented By: | Larry Paul Smith |
| Represented By: | David M. Marco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | John E. Joseph |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
