SPARKS v. FORESTAL et al
| DAVID L. SPARKS |
| KERRY J. FORESTAL and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS |
| 1:2022cv00112 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Address updated for David Sparks from Marion County Jail to Delaware County Jail per Marion County Jail. Dkts. #3 and #4 resent to David Sparks at Delaware County Jail. (JRT) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant, #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DAVID L. SPARKS at Marion County Jail, ADC Mail Room, 695 Justice Way, Indianapolis, IN 46203. Envelope marked return to sender. (LBT) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant, #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DAVID L. SPARKS, Marion County Jail. (AAS) |
Filing 8
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Fifty-Three Cents ($9.53). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through March 17, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S. C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (Copy mailed pursuant to distribution list) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/18/2022. (JDC)
|
| Filing 7 Address updated for DAVID L. SPARKS from MARION COUNTY JAIL, 40 South Alabama Street to MARION COUNTY JAIL, ADC Mail Room, 695 Justice Way, Indianapolis, IN 46203. Dkts. #3 and #4 resent to David L. Sparks at newly updated address for Marion County Jail. (JRT) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to DAVID L. SPARKS at Marion County Jail, 40 South Alabama Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Envelope marked return to sender. (LBT) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #3 *BLANK* Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DAVID L. SPARKS. Return to Sender. Not deliverable as addressed. (AKH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DAVID L. SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, KERRY J. FORESTAL, filed by DAVID L. SPARKS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
