DEBOARD v. MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC et al
| DAVID DEBOARD |
| MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC and BARRETT & STOKELY, INC. |
| 1:2022cv00135 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BARRETT & STOKELY, INC., MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (Rosebrock, Jere) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Rabinowitch on behalf of Defendants BARRETT & STOKELY, INC., MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (Rabinowitch, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan R. Frasher on behalf of Plaintiff DAVID DEBOARD. (Frasher, Ryan) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2022 01:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 2/23/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - The court has received communications from plaintiff's counsel regarding a discovery dispute. It appears that defense counsel was not included on those communications. This is inappropriate. Communications with the magistrate judge regarding discovery matters must either (a) include counsel for all parties, or (b) be made by written motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 2/23/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Initial Extension of Time: This matter having come before the Court on Defendants Midtown West ResidentialPartners, LLC and Barrett & Stokely, Inc.'s Motion for Initial Extension to Answer, and the Court being duly advised in the premises, now GRANTS the Motion. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Midtown West Residential Partners, LLC and Barrett & Stokely, Inc.'s deadline to file a response to the Complaint is extended to March 22, 2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 2/18/2022. (NLR)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 22, 2022 , filed by Defendants BARRETT & STOKELY, INC., MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order on Motion for Initial Extension to Answer)(Rosebrock, Jere) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jere A. Rosebrock on behalf of Defendants BARRETT & STOKELY, INC., MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (Rosebrock, Jere) |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BARRETT & STOKELY, INC., and MIDTOWN WEST RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric G. Calhoun on behalf of Plaintiff DAVID DEBOARD. (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-6931470) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Calhoun, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
