PERRY v. REAGLE et al
| RODNEY PERRY, SR. |
| D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and PFLIEGER |
| 1:2022cv00159 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SCREENING AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Mr. Perry's motion to screen complaint, dkt. #6 , is granted. Because Mr. Perry has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, his complaint is dismissed. Although Mr. Perry's complaint is dismissed, the Court will not yet dismiss the entire action. Mr. Perry shall have through April 4, 2022, to file a viable amended complaint. Failure to comply with this deadline will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/7/2022. (MAC)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Subpoenas to be Issued, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY PERRY, SR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order). (MAC) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Subpoena to be Issued to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY PERRY, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Text of Proposed Order). (MAC) |
| Filing 11 Submission of copy of Consent to E-Service, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY PERRY, SR. (MAC) Modified on 3/1/2022 (MAC). |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ISP (COURT USE ONLY) located at ISP. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ISP (COURT USE ONLY) to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CKM) Modified on 2/23/2022 to correct name of prison (JRT). |
| Filing 9 Letter and Subpoenas to Rokita from RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (MAC) |
| Filing 8 Letter to Rokita from RODNEY S. PERRY, SR. (MAC) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of RODNEY PERRY, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (MAC) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Screen Complaint, filed by Plaintiff RODNEY PERRY, SR. (MAC) |
| Filing 5 **PLEASE DISREGARD, DOCKETED TWICE IN ERROR** NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) Modified on 1/21/2022 (MEH). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN, PFLIEGER, D. REAGLE, filed by RODNEY PERRY, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (LMK) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,Severing Cases, and Resolving Various Motions. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/19/2022.(LMK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
