DURHAM v. BAKER et al
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM |
LEONARD BAKER and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT |
1:2022cv00257 |
February 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - Final judgment is entered for the defendants and against the plaintiff. The plaintiff takes nothing by the complaint, and the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/15/2022. (MAC) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court, filed by Plaintiff DEREK WAYNE DURHAM. (MAC) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DEREK WAYNE DURHAM. (MAC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Defendants LEONARD BAKER, FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Resident Statement)(LMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LEONARD BAKER, FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, filed by DEREK WAYNE DURHAM. (No fee paid with this filing) (LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.