STURGIS v. MARADO et al
| DEMETRIUS I STURGIS |
| MARADO, MATHEMA and TICE/JANE DOE |
| 1:2022cv00290 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL. Mr. Sturgis' motion for assistance with recruiting counsel, dkt. #7 , is denied without prejudice. Mr. Sturgis may renew his motion after the defendants have answered. At this time, Mr. Sturgis should continue his efforts to recruit counsel on his own. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/8/2022. (MAC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) ("the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee."). The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/8/2022. (MAC)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff DEMETRIUS I STURGIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (MAC) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE and Submission of Trust Account Statement, re #5 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff DEMETRIUS I STURGIS. (MAC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through March 15, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, DEMETRIUS I. STURGIS. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARADO, MATHEMA, and TICE/JANE DOE, filed by DEMETRIUS I STURGIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
