DEBOARD v. ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC et al
| DAVID DEBOARD |
| ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC and ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00317 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants' Amended Automatic Initial Extension of Time, Dkt. [ #10 ]. The Court previously granted in part Defendants' request for an extension of time to answer the Plaintiff's complaint. (Dkt. #11 ). Accordingly, the Court, being duly advised, hereby DENIES AS MOOT the present Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 4/6/2022. (SWM)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2022 03:00 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 3/30/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER - This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, Dkt. [ #7 ], seeking a 60-day extension to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff objects to a 60-day extension, and requests that Defendants' extension be limited to 28 days in keeping with Local Rule 6-1. The Court agrees. The Court hereby GRANTS IN PART the present Motion. The Defendants shall have to and including April 25, 2022 by which to respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 3/28/2022. (SWM)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to May 27, 2022 , filed by Defendants ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC. (Ramsey, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to May 27, 2022 , filed by Plaintiff DAVID DEBOARD. (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC. (Ramsey, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to May 27, 2022 , filed by Defendants ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order on Motion for Extension of Time)(Ramsey, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey E. Ramsey on behalf of Defendants ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC. (Ramsey, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan R. Frasher on behalf of Plaintiff DAVID DEBOARD. (Frasher, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric G. Calhoun on behalf of Plaintiff DAVID DEBOARD. (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DAVID DEBOARD. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-6968470) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Calhoun, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
