ADAMS v. HALVOR LINES, INC. et al
CHELSEA ADAMS |
HALVOR LINES, INC. and EDWARD PETERSON |
1:2022cv00452 |
March 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER OF REFERENCE - Based upon the written consent of the parties found in the Case Management Plan [Dkt No. 12], this case is now referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned on the date of this order, any party or attorney of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. The cause number of this action shall be amended as shown above to reflect the referral of this action to the Magistrate Judge. Please use altered case number 1:22-cv-00452-TAB-SEB on all future filings with this court. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/11/2022. (CKM) |
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendants HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON . (Ellis, Asia) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/9/2022 02:00 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties themselves may participate at their option. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/29/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON.(Pfleging, Lesley) |
Filing 9 Statement Responding to the Allegations of Notice of Removal by All Plaintiffs. (Foushee, Nathan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan D. Foushee on behalf of Plaintiff CHELSEA ADAMS. (Foushee, Nathan) |
Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CKM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Asia Larvone Ellis on behalf of Defendants HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON. (Ellis, Asia) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HALVOR LINES, INC.. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Parties First Extension of Time , filed by Defendants HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON (Pfleging, Lesley) Modified on 3/9/2022 (CKM). |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendants HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Lesley A. Pfleging on behalf of Defendants HALVOR LINES, INC., EDWARD PETERSON. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D03-2201-CT-003230, filed by EDWARD PETERSON, HALVOR LINES, INC.. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7002471) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, Appearance, Summons, Jury Demand, Motion for Time, Order Granting Motion for Time, Return of Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement State Court Complaint)(Pfleging, Lesley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.