HALL v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
| MARQ HALL |
| I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY, CHARLIE MIMMSWORTH, WILSON, JACK HENDRIX, RICHARD BROWN, MARK SEVIER, S. JOSEPH, R. BLAIR, G. CECIL, J. FRENCH, S. FITCH, L. STORMS and T. DAVIS |
| 1:2022cv00453 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through May 16, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION For Court Assistance filed by Plaintiff, MARQ HALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, MARQ HALL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint by MARQ HALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. BLAIR, RICHARD BROWN, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR, G. CECIL, T. DAVIS, S. FITCH, J. FRENCH, JACK HENDRIX, I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, S. JOSEPH, CHARLIE MIMMSWORTH, MARK SEVIER, L. STORMS, WILSON, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by MARQ HALL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Classification Appeal, #2 Exhibit 2 Classification Appeal, #3 Exhibit 3 denial of appeal letter, #4 Exhibit 4 Report of Inter-Institutional Transfer, #5 Exhibit 5 disciplinary records including Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, Report of Conduct, Notice to Lay Advocate/Witness, Offender Grievance, and Offender Grievance Response Report, #6 Exhibit 6 denial of appeal, #7 Exhibit 7 Report of Conduct, #8 Exhibit 8 Offender Grievance, #9 Exhibit 9 Offender Grievance Response Report, #10 Exhibit 10 photo, #11 Exhibit 11 Medical Report, #12 Exhibit 12 Request for Interview, #13 Exhibit 13 Report of Conduct, #14 Exhibit 14 Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #15 Exhibit 15 messages, #16 Exhibit 16 Report of Disciplinary Hearing Video Evidence Review, #17 Exhibit 17 messages, #18 Exhibit 18 Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, #19 Exhibit 19 denial of appeal, #20 Exhibit 20 Offender Grievance, #21 Exhibit 21 Return of Grievance, #22 Exhibit 22 Offender Grievance, #23 Exhibit 23 Return of Grievance, #24 Exhibit 24 Report of Inter-Institutional Transfer, #25 Exhibit 25 Classification Appeal, #26 Exhibit 26 appeal denial letter, #27 Exhibit 27 Classification Appeal, #28 Exhibit 28 Request for Interview, #29 Exhibit 29 Request for Interview, #30 Exhibit 30 Request for Interview, #31 Exhibit 31 Request for Interview, #32 Exhibit 32 Request for Interview, #33 Exhibit 33 Request for Interview, #34 Exhibit 34 Request for Interview, #35 Exhibit 35 Offender Grievance Response Report, #36 Exhibit 36 letter, #37 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
