ANDERSON v. KIJAKAZI
| HENRI D ANDERSON |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 1:2022cv00461 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re Briefing Schedule - Within fifty-six (56) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a brief in support of the complaint. Within fifty-six (56) days after service of Plaintiff's brief, Defendant shall file a brief in response. Within twenty-eight (28) days after service of Defendant's opposition brief, Plaintiff will file his/her reply brief, if any. A failure to file a timely brief may result in a summary ruling at the close of the briefing period. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/29/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative records part 1, #3 administrative records part 2, #4 payment documents, #5 jurisdictional documents part 1, #6 jurisdictional records part 2, #7 non disability related records, #8 disability related records part 1, #9 disability related records part 2, #10 medical records part 1, #11 medical records part 2, #12 medical records part 3, #13 medical records part 4, #14 medical records part 5, #15 medical records part 6, #16 medical records part 7, #17 medical records part 8, #18 medical records part 9)(Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Filing No. #2 ), is GRANTED. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/10/2022. (AKH) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (AKH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Scott Rodman on behalf of Plaintiff HENRI D ANDERSON. (Rodman, Jason) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann E. Young on behalf of Plaintiff HENRI D ANDERSON. (Young, Ann) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S. Forbes on behalf of Plaintiff HENRI D ANDERSON. (Forbes, Randal) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff HENRI D ANDERSON. (Forbes, Randal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by HENRI D ANDERSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
