DAVIS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
| BENFORD DAVIS |
| WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MICHAEL MITCHEF, MARTIAL KNEIZER, SHERI WILSON, LISA HAMBLEN, JESSICA LOVE, JANET MITCHELL, JODY MORRIS, SMITH, JOHNATHAN JACKSON and RACHEAL BRUMSFIELD |
| 1:2022cv00488 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifty- Three Dollars and Eighty-Six Cents ($53.86). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through May 16, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S. C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/19/2022. (CKM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BENFORD DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Inmate Trust Account) (CKM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through April 18, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). (Attachments: #1 Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (JRT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT Of BENFORD DAVIS For Compliance With Screening Of Offender Litigation. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against RACHEAL BRUMSFIELD, LISA HAMBLEN, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, MARTIAL KNEIZER, JESSICA LOVE, MICHAEL MITCHEF, JANET MITCHELL, JODY MORRIS, SMITH, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, and SHERI WILSON, filed by BENFORD DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BENFORD DAVIS located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BENFORD DAVIS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
