SPARKS v. WALTHOUR et al
DAVID LEE SPARKS |
WALTHOUR and DELAWARE COUNTY JAIL |
1:2022cv00501 |
March 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Richard L Young |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION for Library Access, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Court's Assistance. See Order. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/26/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 10 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 Mr. Sparks' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Four Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($4.17). Mr. Sparks shall have through May 23, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Mr. Sparks is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/25/2022. (AAS) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to court Regarding Legal Mail and Copy Request, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. Docket Sheet sent to Plaintiff via US Mail (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Docket Sheet) (JRB) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Order for Access to Law Library, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Ex Parte Hearing, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Assistance, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF'S CUSTODIAN TO FORWARD CERTIFIED COPY OF PLAINTIFF'S SIX-MONTH TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT - The Court hereby ORDERS Marion County Sherriff Kerry Forestal or his designee to provide the Court with a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust account statement or Marion County Jail's institutional equivalent for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on March 15, 2022, and to do so no later than April 12, 2022. The trust account statement should be submitted to the Clerk of the Court and should reference case number No. 1:22-cv-501-RLY-MJD. Copy sent to distribution list via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/21/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DAVID LEE SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter and inmate balance history report from Dec. 2021)(JSR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DAVID LEE SPARKS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.