WINEKE v. STEPHENS
| JASON WINEKE |
| DOUG STEPHENS |
| 1:2022cv00569 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons explained in the court's Entry today issued, the court now enters final judgment against Plaintiff. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/26/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CASE - Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/26/2022.(JRB)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS, SCREENING COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSING ACTION - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filing No. #2 is GRANTED. His Motion To Have Case Proceed Filing No. #3 is DENIED. To the extent Plaintiff intended that document to comprise part of his Complaint, it has been considered in the screening review. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, lack of jurisdiction, and because the named defendant is absolutely immune from suit. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies discussed herein or to show cause why this case should not be dismissed by April 25, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/28/2022. (AAS)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to have case proceed, filed by Plaintiff JASON WINEKE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JASON WINEKE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SSA Benefit Verification Letter, #2 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOUG STEPHENS, filed by JASON WINEKE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WINEKE v. STEPHENS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JASON WINEKE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOUG STEPHENS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
