SHAFEEK v. STATE OF INDIANA
| ATAUL SHAFEEK |
| STATE OF INDIANA |
| 1:2022cv00628 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent STATE OF INDIANA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - CCS, #2 Exhibit 2 - DA Dkt., #3 Exhibit 3 - DA Appellant, #4 Exhibit 4 - DA Appellee, #5 Exhibit 5 - DA Memo, #6 Exhibit 6 - PCR CCS, #7 Exhibit 7 - PCR Dkt., #8 Exhibit 8 - Order dismissing appeal)(Drum, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 8
RECEIPT #IP078958 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by ATAUL SHAFEEK. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 7
Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ATAUL SHAFEEK. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CKM)
|
|
Filing 6
Submission of Request for Remittance, filed by Petitioner ATAUL SHAFEEK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ATAUL SHAFEEK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondent STATE OF INDIANA. (Drum, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - ATAUL SHAFEEK's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 89C01-1301-MR-001. Petitioner shall have through 5/2/2022, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his/her financial inability to do so. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 4/11/2022. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 5/12/2022. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 6/2/2022. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/31/2022. (MAC)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ATAUL SHAFEEK, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHAFEEK v. STATE OF INDIANA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ATAUL SHAFEEK | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA | |
| Represented By: | Jesse R. Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
