THOMAS v. DCS et al
Plaintiff: BRENDA THOMAS
Defendant: DCS, SHAMEKA NEWMAN and STATE OF INDIANA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00678
Filed: April 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
2 Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
3 Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY - the court DIRECTS the CLERK to docket the Complaint Filing No. #1 as an amended complaint in Thomas's other case, 1:21-cv-2127. Thomas can proceed in the older case, where the court has already granted her leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As Thomas is bringing the same claims in the older case, her Complaint in this case 1:22-cv-678, Filing No. #1 is DIMISSED without prejudice. Her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case Filing No. #2 is DENIED as moot. The court DIRECTS the CLERK to close this case, 1:22-cv-678. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/25/2022.(AAS) Modified on 4/25/2022 (AAS).
April 13, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. Judge Sarah Evans Barker and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore are no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:22-cv-678-RLY-DML, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch for all further proceedings. This case is related to 1:21-cv-02127-RLY-DML. Judge Sarah Evans Barker and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/13/2022. (LDH)
April 5, 2022 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (NLR)
April 5, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRENDA THOMAS. (NLR)
April 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DCS, SHAMEKA NEWMAN, STATE OF INDIANA, filed by BRENDA THOMAS. (No fee paid with this filing) (NLR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS v. DCS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRENDA THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DCS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAMEKA NEWMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?