JENNINGS v. HOLCOMB et al
| LEON JENNINGS |
| ERIC HOLCOMB, GWENDOLYN HORTH, KRISTINE JOHNSON, ZACH ZIMMERMAN and B. PETERSON |
| 1:2022cv00690 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LEON JENNINGS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 8
ORDER ON IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - Leon Jennings's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as presented. Dkt. #7 . Mr. Jennings previous motion, dkt. 3, was denied because the trust account records he provided did not cover the entire six-month period prior to the filing of this complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). The "Offender Activity Report" Mr. Jennings attached does not include his account activity after January 20, 2022. Dkt. 7-1 at 20. Mr. Jennings shall have until May 31, 2022 in which renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an updated copy of his trust account statement. The motion must include records that cover the entire six-month period before he filed this action on April 4, 2022. Otherwise, he must pay the $402.00 filing fee. Failure to appropriately respond will result in this action being dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/11/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LEON JENNINGS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - Inmate Trust Fund Account, #2 Envelope)(DWH) Modified on 5/6/2022 - modified Exhibit 2 to read Envelope (DWH). |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by LEON JENNINGS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - Leon Jennings's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as presented. Dkt. #3 . Because Mr. Jennings is a prisoner as defined in 28 U.S.C. 1915(h), he must submit a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the six-month period preceding the filing of his complaint on April 4, 2022. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). The "Offender Activity Report" Mr. Jennings attached does not include his account activity after January 19, 2022. Dkt. 3-1 at 15. Mr. Jennings shall have until May 11, 2022 in which renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an updated copy of his trust account statement. Otherwise, he must pay the $400.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/11/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, LEON JENNINGS. (Attachments: #1 Offender Activity, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 Submission of Supplemental Complaint filed by Plaintiff, LEON JENNINGS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ERIC HOLCOMB, GWENDOLYN HORTH, KRISTINE JOHNSON, B. PETERSON, ZACH ZIMMERMAN, filed by LEON JENNINGS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including letter, Recommended Action Forms, Classification Appeal, and Appearance, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
