FINISHMASTER, INC. v. ADMIRE
FINISHMASTER, INC. |
Michael Admire |
1:2022cv00704 |
April 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Doris L Pryor |
Doris L pryor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Plaintiff, FinishMaster, Inc., and Defendant, Michael Admire, have filed #27 a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/4/2022.(AKH) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint, as to Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC., Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE, filed by FINISHMASTER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Seidler, Robert) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #25 Motion for Extension of Time - The parties shall have to and including October 3, 2022 to file dismissal documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 9/28/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to Oct. 3, 2022 in which to #24 OrderTerminate Deadlines and HearingsTerminate Motions to Finalize Settlement Details and File Stipulation of Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order granting Motion for Extension of Time to Finalize Settlement Details)(Seidler, Robert) |
Filing 24 ORDER directing filing of documents authorizing dismissal within 30 days of the date of this entry. All pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 8/26/2022.(CBU) |
Filing 23 Witness List - Preliminary, filed by Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE, Exhibit List - Preliminary, filed by Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE. (Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 22 Exhibit List [Preliminary], filed by Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC., Witness List [Preliminary], filed by Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC.. (Seidler, Robert) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting Parties' #20 Joint Motion for Continuance - Settlement Conference RESET for 11/3/2022 09:00 AM (Eastern Time) in room #255, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. All other requirements of the Court's scheduling order dated June 17, 2022 (Dkt. #15 ) shall remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 7/14/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 20 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Settlement Conference, filed by Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Continue Settlement Conference)(Seidler, Robert) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Responding to any written request for discovery or admission, filed by Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE. (Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 18 ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/17/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 17 ORDER Regarding Discovery Disputes. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/17/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 16 ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Dispositive Motions due by 4/7/2023. Discovery due by 2/8/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/17/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor: The parties appeared by counsel for an Initial Pretrial Conference on June 13, 2022. The Court will approve the Case Management Plan, by separate order, with the changes to which the parties have agreed. This matter is scheduled for a settlement conference on August 19, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern), in Room 255, United States Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. **See Entry for Additional Information.** Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. (CAG) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting Defendant's #12 Motion for Continuance - Initial Pretrial Conference RESET for 6/13/2022 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated phone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. All other requirements of the Court's order dated May 12, 2022 (Dkt. #6 ) shall remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 6/2/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference, filed by Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court sua sponte now RESCHEDULES the Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for June 2, 2022 to June 3, 2022 at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern). Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 5/31/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff FINISHMASTER, INC. . (Seidler, Robert) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Affirmative Defenses, filed by MICHAEL ADMIRE.(Craig, Darren) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 6/2/2022 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 5/12/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant MICHAEL ADMIRE. (Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Darren Andrew Craig on behalf of Defendant Michael Admire. (Craig, Darren) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Ann Rulon on behalf of Defendant Michael Admire. (Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D07-2203-PL-007021, filed by Michael Admire. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7049663) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rulon, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FINISHMASTER, INC. v. ADMIRE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: FINISHMASTER, INC. | |
Represented By: | Robert F. Seidler |
Represented By: | Zachary A. Ahonen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael Admire | |
Represented By: | Darren Andrew Craig |
Represented By: | Jennifer Ann Rulon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.