FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY v. DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC et al
FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY |
DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC and WAGLER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC |
1:2022cv00800 |
April 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default , filed by Plaintiff FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for Entry of Default, #2 Entry of Default)(Eckler, Donald) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY. DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC served on 5/17/2022. (Eckler, Donald) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC. (AKH) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC. (Eckler, Donald) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald Patrick Eckler on behalf of Plaintiff FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY. (Eckler, Donald) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7074841) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eckler, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.