COOPER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
| Ms. DEBRA COOPER and DEBRA COOPER |
| CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MAYOR JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, JOE HOGSETT and RANDAL TAYLOR |
| 1:2022cv00917 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR. (Giffin, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Giffin, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Resetting Conference - The court, on its own motion, RESETS the July 27, 2022 initial pretrial conference for August 4, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern). The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/23/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/27/2022 09:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 5/25/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Parties First Extension of Time, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR (Giffin, Matthew) Modified on 5/25/2022 - edited title (AKH).
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew K. Giffin on behalf of Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR. (Giffin, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 8
Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to All Plaintiffs. (Borinstein, Rochelle)
|
|
Filing 7
SummonsES Issued as to JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, and RANDAL TAYLOR. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 6
Submission of Signature Requirement re #3 Notice of Appearance by All Plaintiffs. (Springer, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to All Plaintiffs. (Borinstein, Rochelle)
|
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Rochelle Elaine Borinstein on behalf of Plaintiff DEBRA COOPER. (Borinstein, Rochelle)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Rochelle Elaine Borinstein on behalf of Plaintiff DEBRA COOPER. (Borinstein, Rochelle)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DEBRA COOPER. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7096553) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons, Mayor; Summons Chief of Police)(Borinstein, Rochelle)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
