PERKINS v. CLARK et al
Plaintiff: DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR.
Defendant: BRAIN CLARK, R. KEEGAN SULLIVAN and MATTHEW BAILY
Case Number: 1:2022cv00921
Filed: April 29, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF'S CUSTODIAN TO FORWARD CERTIFIED COPY OF PLAINTIFF'S TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT - the court ORDERS the warden or his designee at the Decatur County Jail to provide the court with a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on April 29, 2022, and to do so no later than July 21, 2022. The trust account statement should be submitted to the Clerk of Court and should reference case number 1:22-cv-00921-RLY-MPB. The court will rule on Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis following receipt of the required financial statement. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff and Warden via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/22/2022. (AAS)
June 17, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION Requesting Court's Assistance, filed by Plaintiff DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE PRISON TRUST STATEMENT - Plaintiff is ordered to submit a copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) no later than Friday, June 24, 2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/1/2022.(AAS)
May 23, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
May 11, 2022 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR)
April 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR)
April 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW BAILY, BRAIN CLARK, R. KEEGAN SULLIVAN, filed by DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PERKINS v. CLARK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRAIN CLARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. KEEGAN SULLIVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW BAILY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?