APANAVICIUS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: DREW APANAVICIUS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Case Number: 1:2022cv00925
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2672 mv Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - The parties have notified the Court that this matter has settled (Dkt. #9 ). It is therefore ordered that all dates and deadlines previously established are vacated. Any pending motion is denied as moot. The parties are directed to finalize the agreement to resolve these claims, and to file the appropriate dismissal papers with the Clerk of Court on or before August 2, 2022. Failure to do so will result in dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/1/2022. (AKH)
June 30, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement , as to Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff DREW APANAVICIUS, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Preston, Jeffrey)
June 30, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey D. Preston on behalf of Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Preston, Jeffrey)
June 8, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (AKH)
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by DREW APANAVICIUS. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE served on 5/17/2022; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 5/17/2022. (AKH)
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Administrative Tort Claim, filed by Plaintiff DREW APANAVICIUS (AKH)
May 24, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DREW APANAVICIUS. (AKH)
May 12, 2022 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR)
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to USA - UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (JSR)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by DREW APANAVICIUS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number IP079116) (JSR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APANAVICIUS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DREW APANAVICIUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?