DOYLE v. SCHERSCHEL
Plaintiff: PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Defendant: JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL
Case Number: 1:2022cv01116
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 58 - For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order entered this day, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/28/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail.(JSR)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY SCREENING AMENDED COMPLAINT - The Court concludes that because Mr. Doyle's allegations focus on the handling of his state court cases, permitting amendment would be futile. Thus, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Final judgment shall enter accordingly. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/28/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail.(JSR)
July 25, 2022 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL, filed by PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR)
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Doyle's Complaint, #1 , is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mr. Doyle may file an Amended Complaint that addresses the issues outlined in this Order on or before July 21, 2022. The failure to file an Amended Complaint by that date will result in dismissal of this action. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/23/2022. (JDC)
June 9, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - A review of the docket in this case indicates that Plaintiff Patrick Evan David Doyle has neither paid the $402 filing fee nor filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. To the extent Mr. Doyle intended for the submission of his "Resident Account Summary" to be a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, it is DENIED because it is not accompanied by an actual motion. [ #2 .] A failure to either pay the $402 filing fee by June 30, 2022 or to file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by that date may result in the dismissal of this action. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Form IFP Motion) (BRR)
June 1, 2022 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
May 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Resident Account Summary), filed by Plaintiff PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL, filed by PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOYLE v. SCHERSCHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?