TURNER v. SEVIER
SPENCER TURNER |
MARK SEVIER |
1:2022cv01127 |
June 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies , filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies, filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Sentencing Order with date Modification, #2 Exhibit B. Community Corrections Notice, #3 Exhibit C. Probation Community Corrections Hearing Entry, #4 Exhibit D. Sentencing Order, #5 Exhibit E. Sentencing Order with date December 29, 2016, #6 Exhibit F. March 14, 2022 State Court Order)(Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Thomas Pratt replacing Jesse R. Drum on behalf of MARK SEVIER (Pratt, Thomas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Gustavo Angel Jimenez on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by SPENCER TURNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Drum, Jesse) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - SPENCER TURNER's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 49G20-0910-FA-088411. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by June 20, 2022. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by July 21, 2022. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by August 11, 2022. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/9/2022. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SPENCER TURNER. (Filing fee $5, receipt number 258) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TURNER v. SEVIER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: SPENCER TURNER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK SEVIER | |
Represented By: | Gustavo Angel Jimenez |
Represented By: | Jesse R. Drum |
Represented By: | Thomas Pratt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.