TURNER v. SEVIER
Petitioner: SPENCER TURNER
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Case Number: 1:2022cv01127
Filed: June 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Filing 9 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies , filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Jimenez, Gustavo)
July 21, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies, filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Sentencing Order with date Modification, #2 Exhibit B. Community Corrections Notice, #3 Exhibit C. Probation Community Corrections Hearing Entry, #4 Exhibit D. Sentencing Order, #5 Exhibit E. Sentencing Order with date December 29, 2016, #6 Exhibit F. March 14, 2022 State Court Order)(Jimenez, Gustavo)
July 19, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Thomas Pratt replacing Jesse R. Drum on behalf of MARK SEVIER (Pratt, Thomas)
July 19, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Gustavo Angel Jimenez on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Jimenez, Gustavo)
June 13, 2022 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by SPENCER TURNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
June 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Drum, Jesse)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - SPENCER TURNER's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 49G20-0910-FA-088411. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by June 20, 2022. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by July 21, 2022. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by August 11, 2022. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/9/2022. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DWH)
June 2, 2022 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR)
June 1, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SPENCER TURNER. (Filing fee $5, receipt number 258) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(JSR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TURNER v. SEVIER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SPENCER TURNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Represented By: Gustavo Angel Jimenez
Represented By: Jesse R. Drum
Represented By: Thomas Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?