SNYDER v. DCS et al
| STEPHANIE E. SNYDER |
| DCS, AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER, KAREN LOVE, MICHELLE AND LERIN SCHOFIELD, HEIDI CLOSSIN, KRISTEN MILLER, COURTNEY CROWE, STEPHEN 'PETE' FREEMAN, TEHRENA BROWN and LAURA DENNIS |
| 1:2022cv01154 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to STEPHANIE E. SNYDER. No such Number. Mailed to Old Address. **Re-mailed to updated address 7/5/22** (AKH) |
Filing 7
ENTRY REGARDING SERVICE OF NOTICES - It has come to the Court's attention that the Notice to Pro Se Litigants (Dkt. #3 ) and Notice of Deficiency (Dkt. #4 ) were mailed to the incorrect address for pro se Plaintiff Stephanie E. Snyder, and those Notices were returned to the Court as undeliverable. The Clerk is directed to mail again the Notice to Pro Se Litigants (Dkt. #3 ) and Notice of Deficiency (Dkt. #4 ) to Plaintiff at the following address: Stephanie E. Snyder, 3681 N. State Route 7, Madison, IN 47250. Plaintiff shall have through Friday, July 29, 2022, to correct the deficiency noted in the Notice of Deficiency (Dkt. #4 ). Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. (Copies sent to plaintiff's updated address via US mail). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/28/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice of Deficiency sent to STEPHANIE E. SNYDER. Return to Sender. No such number. (AKH) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #3 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to STEPHANIE E. SNYDER. Return to Sender. No Such Number. Unable to Forward. (AKH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 6/30/2022 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (TRG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TEHRENA BROWN, HEIDI CLOSSIN, SUZANNE CONGER, COURTNEY CROWE, DCS, LAURA DENNIS, STEPHEN 'PETE' FREEMAN, AUBREY JENKINS, KAREN LOVE, KRISTEN MILLER, MICHELLE AND LERIN SCHOFIELD, filed by STEPHANIE E. SNYDER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
