ROBERTSON v. REAGLE et al
| HERBERT E. ROBERTSON |
| DENNIS REAGLE, CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH, CENTURION HEALTH, LISA HAMBLIN, SHERRI WILSON, MARTIAL KNIESAR, CARL KUENZIL, DUAN PIERCE, ADONIAH MUKONA, C. MARTIN, KUBEL, MISSY BAGNIESKI, ELIZABETH HALE, JOHN MERSHON, OBLOOSA, SHOPLANGER and ANGIE REYNOLDS |
| 1:2022cv01193 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of HERBERT E. ROBERTSON. Copy to Plaintiff and Warden via US Mail. Copy to Finance Dept. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/19/2022.(SWM)
|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #724 for partial filing fee in the amount of $26.47, paid by HERBERT ROBERTSON. (JSR) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON #3 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty-Six Dollars and Forty-Seven Cents ($26.47). The plaintiff shall have through July 15, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S. C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (See Order). NEF regenerated to Finance per distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/17/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff HERBERT E. ROBERTSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Statement)(JSR) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against MISSY BAGNIESKI, CENTURION HEALTH, CONYERS, ELIZABETH HALE, LISA HAMBLIN, MARTIAL KNIESAR, KUBEL, CARL KUENZIL, C. MARTIN, JOHN MERSHON, ADONIAH MUKONA, OBLOOSA, DUAN PIERCE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANGIE REYNOLDS, SHOPLANGER, WEXFORD HEALTH, SHERRI WILSON, filed by HERBERT E. ROBERTSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (JSR) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by HERBERT E. ROBERTSON located at ISP. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by HERBERT E. ROBERTSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
