BUIS v. CHOICE RECOVERY, INC.
| CHELSA BUIS |
| CHOICE RECOVERY, INC. |
| 1:2022cv01203 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty days of this date, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/12/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/31/2022 at 1:30 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/13/2022.(CBU)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CHOICE RECOVERY, INC.. (Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by CHOICE RECOVERY, INC..(Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Personal Service, filed by CHELSA BUIS. CHOICE RECOVERY, INC. served on 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (MRI) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (BRR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CHOICE RECOVERY, INC.. (BRR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff CHELSA BUIS. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against CHOICE RECOVERY, INC., filed by CHELSA BUIS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7148061) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The March 1, 2022, letter sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's May 2, 2022, Experian credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BUIS v. CHOICE RECOVERY, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHELSA BUIS | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHOICE RECOVERY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Boyd W. Gentry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
