SHOEMAKER v. CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.
BOBBI SHOEMAKER |
CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. |
1:2022cv01425 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Richard L Young |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Ke Liu hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Liu, Ke) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #11 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of Arbitration. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 221425. (SWM) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of Arbitration, filed by Plaintiff BOBBI SHOEMAKER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marco, David) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/30/2022 01:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/10/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.. (Liu, Ke) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.. (Liu, Ke) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ke Liu on behalf of Defendant CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.. (Liu, Ke) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna-Katrina S. Christakis on behalf of Defendant CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.. (Christakis, Anna-Katrina) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. (JRB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Plaintiff BOBBI SHOEMAKER. (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Marco on behalf of Plaintiff BOBBI SHOEMAKER. (Marco, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against CHIME FINANCIAL, INC., filed by BOBBI SHOEMAKER. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7194134) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SHOEMAKER v. CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BOBBI SHOEMAKER | |
Represented By: | Larry Paul Smith |
Represented By: | David M. Marco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. | |
Represented By: | Anna-Katrina S. Christakis |
Represented By: | Ke Liu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.