CROCKETT v. WARDEN
Plaintiff: WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III and WILLIAM CROCKETT III
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 1:2022cv01459
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Faye Weiss on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Weiss, Natalie)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Petitioner William B. Crockett, III's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in WVD 18-05-0128. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2022. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/18/2022.(JDC)
July 28, 2022 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC)
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Court Assistance, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
July 21, 2022 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JDC)
July 21, 2022 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00552. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 Case electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. (mrm) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 7/21/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 7/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 7/21/2022.]
July 18, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00. Receipt #3029424.), filed by William Crockett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Crockett)(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 7/21/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CROCKETT v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CROCKETT III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Represented By: Natalie Faye Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?