MAYNARD v. BURKHART et al
| TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD |
| BRAD BURKHART, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and QUALITY HEALTH CARE |
| 1:2022cv01462 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL - Plaintiff Timothy Wayne Maynard's motion to compel, dkt. [ #10 ], is DENIED for the same reasons set forth in the Court's Order of August 10, 2022. See dkt. 9. Mr. Maynard is instructed to stop filing premature discovery motions. Before this action can proceed, Mr. Maynard's complaint must be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Once the complaint has been screened and the defendants have appeared in this matter, Mr. Maynard will then be able to serve his discovery requests on counsel for the defendants. He may serve these discovery requests on the defendants only after the court has entered a scheduling order governing the discovery phase of this case. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/19/2022. (SWM)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER - DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL; Plaintiff Timothy Wayne Maynard's motion to compel documents, dkt. #8 , is denied as premature. Before this action can proceed, Mr. Maynard's complaint must be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Once the complaint has been screened and the defendants have appeared in this matter, Mr. Maynard will then be able to serve his discovery requests on counsel for the defendants. He may serve these discovery requests on the defendants only after the court has entered a scheduling order governing the discovery phase of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/10/22. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Compel, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #1190 for partial filing fee in the amount of $8.00, paid by Lisa Baxter via check on behalf of TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (DJH) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Eight Dollars. The plaintiff shall have through August 22, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/25/2022. (JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (dist. made) (NLR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification of Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(NLR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRAD BURKHART, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, QUALITY HEALTH CARE, filed by TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(NLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
