HARDING v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
HEIDI HARDING |
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC. |
1:2022cv01465 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference before United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on October 12, 2022, at 9 a.m. in Room 234, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. All persons entering the United States Courthouse must have photo identification. The parties shall file the proposed CMP no less than three days prior to the pretrial conference. **SEE ORDER**(MGG) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and Demand for Trial by Jury, filed by DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC..(Culp, James) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.. (Culp, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.. (Culp, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. Whitten on behalf of Defendant DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.. (Whitten, Christopher) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by James L. Culp on behalf of Defendant DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.. (Culp, James) |
Filing 8 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by All Plaintiffs. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC. served on 7/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt and Green Card)(Kehoe, D.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Emily Kathleen VanTyle hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (VanTyle, Emily) |
Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC. (DJH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Kathleen VanTyle on behalf of Plaintiff HEIDI HARDING. (VanTyle, Emily) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by D. Bruce Kehoe on behalf of Plaintiff HEIDI HARDING. (Kehoe, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC., filed by HEIDI HARDING. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7201603) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Kehoe, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARDING v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: HEIDI HARDING | |
Represented By: | Emily Kathleen VanTyle |
Represented By: | D. Bruce Kehoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Christopher R. Whitten |
Represented By: | James L. Culp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.