PERRYMAN v. FLEX N GATE CORPORATION, doing business as FLEX-N-GATE LLC
| INARA PERRYMAN |
| FLEX N GATE CORPORATION doing business as FLEX-N-GATE LLC and FLEX N GATE CORPORATION, doing business as FLEX-N-GATE LLC |
| 1:2022cv01502 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default , filed by Plaintiff INARA PERRYMAN. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by INARA PERRYMAN. FLEX N GATE CORPORATION, doing business as FLEX-N-GATE LLC served on 8/3/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to FLEX N GATE CORPORATION, doing business as FLEX-N-GATE LLC. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric D. Coleman on behalf of Plaintiff INARA PERRYMAN. (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Plaintiff INARA PERRYMAN. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FLEX N GATE CORPORATION, filed by INARA PERRYMAN. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7210847) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
