CRISS v. STATE OF INDIANA
| TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. |
| STATE OF INDIANA |
| 1:2022cv01533 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
RESPONSE to Order at Dkt. #8 - Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Court to Order Release of Inmate Trust Account. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's custodian at Decatur County Detention Center to provide Plaintiff with a certified copy of his trust account statement or its institutional equivalent for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on August 1, 2022, and to do so no later than Friday, September 23, 2022. Plaintiff shall then have until Friday, October 7, 2022, to respond to the Notice of Deficiency (Dkt. 5). The Clerk is directed to include a copy of the "Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Prisoner)" form along with the Plaintiff's copy of this Entry. (Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Blank form Motion) (JDC)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Court to Order Release of Inmate Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff TERRY LEE CRISS JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 8/31/2022 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (TRG)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against STATE OF INDIANA, filed by TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CRISS v. STATE OF INDIANA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TERRY LEE CRISS, JR. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
