FABRICE NDZANA v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY
| JEAN FABRICE NDZANA |
| BALL STATE UNIVERSITY |
| 1:2022cv01540 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Corporate Disclosure Statement by BALL STATE UNIVERSITY. (Shockley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 12
DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant BALL STATE UNIVERSITY. (Shockley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by BALL STATE UNIVERSITY.(Shockley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 10
RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by JEAN FABRICE NDZANA. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY served on 8/9/2022. (Kozlova, Diana)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER:Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/14/2022 02:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Section III(A) through (E) of the proposed CMP shall include the following deadlines (see Order for established deadlines and additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/11/2022.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant BALL STATE UNIVERSITY. (Shockley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott E. Shockley on behalf of Defendant BALL STATE UNIVERSITY. (Shockley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 6
PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to BALL STATE UNIVERSITY. (DRB)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of Plaintiff JEAN FABRICE NDZANA. (Dutkanych, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Kozlova on behalf of Plaintiff JEAN FABRICE NDZANA. (Kozlova, Diana)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against BALL STATE UNIVERSITY, filed by JEAN FABRICE NDZANA. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7219092) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Kozlova, Diana)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FABRICE NDZANA v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JEAN FABRICE NDZANA | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Dutkanych, III |
| Represented By: | Diana Kozlova |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BALL STATE UNIVERSITY | |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Shockley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
