BROCK v. HAMBLEN et al
| CLYDE BROCK |
| LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and CENTURION HEALTH |
| 1:2022cv01734 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER - Mr. Brock's motion for extension of time, dkt. [ #9 ], is granted such that he shall have through November 21, 2022, to pay the assessed initial partial filing fee of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) to the clerk of the district court. Failure to pay the fee by this extended deadline may result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 10/25/2022. (SWM)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff CLYDE BROCK. (CKM) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifty Dollars ($50.00). The plaintiff shall have through October 21, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/23/2022. (RSF)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CLYDE BROCK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Statement) (CKM) |
| Filing 6 Letter to Court from Clyde Brock re Non-Consent to MJ. (CKM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through October 11, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Attachments: #1 Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (JRT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CENTURION HEALTH, LISA HAMBLEN, MERSHON, and REGAL, filed by CLYDE BROCK. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by CLYDE BROCK located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by CLYDE BROCK to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
