TREECE v. WILSON PIZZA COMPANY et al
| Larry R Treece and LARRY R. TREECE |
| Wilson Pizza Company and Scott Wilson |
| 1:2022cv01757 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLOSED DISMISSED/ MARGINAL ENTRY acknowledges #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/4/2022.(LBT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff LARRY R. TREECE. (Serrano, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Isabel Serrano on behalf of Plaintiff LARRY R. TREECE. (Serrano, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SCOTT WILSON, WILSON PIZZA COMPANY. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Larry R Treece. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7265816) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Scott Wilson, #3 Proposed Summons Wilson Pizza Company, #4 Notice of Consent to be a Party Plaintiff)(Serrano, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
