SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC v. ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC. et al
| SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC |
| ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC. and DANNY CHAN |
| 1:2022cv01852 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC., DANNY CHAN. (Tipton, David) |
| Filing 17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC., DANNY CHAN. (Attachments: #1 proposed order)(Tipton, David) |
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 12/12/2022 at 12:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/14/2022.(JRB)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Charles Lee Mudd, Jr hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Lee Mudd, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC., DANNY CHAN. (Tipton, David) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC.. ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC. waiver sent on 9/21/2022. (Tipton, David) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by DANNY CHAN. DANNY CHAN waiver sent on 9/21/2022. (Tipton, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Tipton on behalf of Defendants ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC., DANNY CHAN. (Tipton, David) |
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional Statement of Spectrevision Industries LLC, re #4 Order by SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (Mudd, Charles) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (RAGS) (DWH) |
| Filing 6 ***PLEASE DISREGARD - DOCKETED WITHOUT PDF ATTACHMENT - SEE DKT 7 FOR ATTACHMENT*** NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (RAGS) (DWH) Modified on 9/22/2022 (DWH). |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON JURISDICTION - Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a jurisdictional statement by October 20, 2022, addressing the issue identified in this order (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 9/21/2022. (DWH)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ALMOST NEVER FILMS INC. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by SPECTREVISION INDUSTRIES LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number BINSDC-7287729) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Corporate Guarantee, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Action Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Mudd, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
