MULLIS v. MYERS
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS |
MATTHEW MYERS |
1:2022cv01867 |
September 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Doris L Pryor |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty-Five Dollars and Ninety-Six Cents ($25.96). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through December 2, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/4/2022 Copy sent the Mr. Mullis via US Mail (CBU) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Court Order to Garnish Inmate Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) Modified on 11/4/2022 - Updated filed date to match stamp on envelope (JSR). |
Filing 14 RESPONSE re #11 Order on Motion, Submission of Trust Account Statement. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Order - Dkt 11, #2 Envelope)(JSR) |
Filing 13 ORDER Denying as Motion for Court Order to Obtain Trust Account - Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order to Obtain 6-Month Inmate Trust Account, Dkt. [ #12 ], is denied as moot. The Court has already issued an Order directing Plaintiff's custodian to file a copy of his inmate trust account statement. See Dkt. 11. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 10/25/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Court Order to Obtain 6 Month Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 10 ENTRY ON #6 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL DEMAND - Mr. Mullis's motion for jury trial, dkt. #6 , is GRANTED to the EXTENT that if this action proceeds to trial, the trial will be scheduled as a jury trial. The clerk is DIRECTED to update the docket to reflect that Mr. Mullis has demanded a jury trial. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/17/2022. (AKH) |
Filing 11 ORDER Directing Plaintiff's Custodian to Forward Certified Copy of Inmate Trust Account Statement - Mr. Mullis's motion, dkt. [ #9 ], is granted. The Court hereby ORDERS Sheriff Matthew A. Myers or his designee at the Bartholomew County Jail to provide the Court with a certified copy of Mr. Mullis's trust account statement or Bartholomew County Jail's institutional equivalent for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on September 21, 2022, and to do so no later than November 11, 2022. The trust account statement should be submitted to the Clerk of the Court and should reference case number No. 1:22- cv-1867-TWP-DLP. Upon receipt of the required statement, the Court will assess what initial partial filing fee must be paid, if any, and whether a collection order should be entered to collect the filing fee. See Order for additional information. Copy to Plaintiff and Sheriff Matthew A. Myers via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 10/14/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Court Order to get Inmate Trust Account Copy, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) Modified to correct event on 10/14/2022 (JRT). |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through October 28, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Jury Trial, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS (only). (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW MYERS, filed by BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MULLIS v. MYERS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MATTHEW MYERS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.